Poser over NEP exit | Selangor Times
Issue 118


Poser over NEP exit
Writer: Lee Hwok Aun
Published: Fri, 27 Jul 2012

Are we ready to exit the New Economic Policy?

That was the subject of a debate last week.

I argued: “No, we are not ready to exit the NEP.”

Yes, that’s my conviction, not a position assigned by coin flip.
Maybe you are surprised, as were many in attendance. A Malaysian Chinese saying we’re not ready to exit the NEP? Take a deep breath.

Let me stress one thing. To say we are not ready to exit the NEP is not to defend every aspect of the NEP and support its implementation forever.

Whether we are ready to exit boils down to two sub-questions: Are we grasping the meaning and problems of the NEP? Do we have an adequate set of solutions to these problems?

Answer to both is No.

So are we ready to exit the NEP? No. Not yet.

We are not thinking clearly about the NEP, and have a feeble grasp of what we are exiting from.

Worse still, we are making minor adjustments and projecting them as systemic reforms, thus deluding ourselves.

The NEP set out two prongs. First, to eradicate poverty irrespective of race. This is non-controversial; we will always have anti-poverty programmes to some extent.

But let us be clear that the particular measures applied toward this objective revolve around basic provisions, such as primary and secondary schooling, health facilities, utilities and infrastructure and social safety nets.

The NEP’s second prong was to accelerate social restructuring to reduce and eventually eliminate the identification of race with economic function.

When talking about exiting the NEP we are decidedly referring to this second prong.

The principal problem is vastly different from the first prong, and from need-based poverty alleviation in general.

The NEP’s second prong addressed the lack of bumiputera participation in tertiary education, professional and management positions, and ownership.

Why should this be distinguished as a policy objective? Because persistent under-representation of a group in these positions is a socially undesirable and unsustainable state, and because barriers to enter these socioeconomic layers exist – grades for university entry, degree qualifications for professional jobs, experience and connections to do business, and so on.

These obstacles would make change happen very slowly without a big push and coordinated effort.

How did the NEP seek to increase the pace of social restructuring?

The distinctive feature of the second prong is bumiputera preference.

Some degree of preferential treatment would be required – in principle, temporarily – to increase bumiputera participation to an extent that ordinarily would not happen.

The situation in 1971, at the start of the NEP, warranted such intervention.

I never hear anyone disputing the “original” NEP. The situation today is vastly different; achievements and problems abound. But that is the subject for another article.

Regardless of what we think about the basis and outcomes of the NEP’s second prong, we must not lose sight of its distinctive feature: bumiputera preference.

We tend to forget or ignore the NEP instruments that must be central to any consideration of exiting the policy.

I am referring to Mara institutions, matriculation colleges, quotas in university admissions, scholarships, licensing, contracting, and the civil service, as well as equity requirements and GLC policies.

Exiting the NEP entails transitioning away from bumiputera preference in these programmes, or phasing them out altogether.

Clearly, these policies are not the same as the NEP’s first prong, which basically gives preference to the poor in basic areas where such targeting based on need is relevant and workable.

The second prong centres on facilitating bumiputera upward social mobility through group preference.

The two prongs are inter-related, but one cannot replace the other.

We cannot simply shift from bumiputera preference to pro-poor preference in, say, civil service employment and government contracting.

Imagine what this entails: giving preference in recruitment and promotion to someone because her parents had low income, or awarding a contract to the guy from the poorest family.

You can see how this does not make sense, and can be damaging to economic efficiency.

Yet we are entertaining an apparent consensus that we can replace the NEP’s second prong with something called “need-based affirmative action.”

This notion is muddled, misleading, convenient and delusional.

Tellingly, how need-based affirmative action (a rebranded NEP first prong) replaces the NEP’s second prong has never been outlined with specifics, beyond being a nice idea with a catchy slogan.

It is not bold or reformist. Indeed, it conveniently avoids the hardest, yet most crucial, of reforms.

I reiterate, I am not arguing that we retain the NEP forever.

I am pressing us to ask the hard and uncomfortable questions about how we might transition away from its current form.

How can we talk of reforming and exiting the NEP when we do not touch its most extensive and impactful programmes in tertiary education and the civil service?

Most notably, matriculation programmes are widely known to be an easier route to university, and the vast majority of bumiputera students pass through it.

Of course, most of the predominantly bumiputera students in these colleges bear socioeconomic disadvantage. But by maintaining an easier programme we waste an opportunity to narrow the schooling gap.

Unless matriculation goes a much greater distance to level the playing field, we are far from exiting the NEP.

This is a pressing issue for all Malaysians, not just the bumiputera community.

This entails very difficult and politically unpopular tasks.

It looks to me that we need to raise the standards of matriculation programmes, then merge the currently parallel systems into a common university entry examination.

Only then can we truly speak of meritocracy, and earnestly prepare bumiputera students for it.

But we do not talk of such things. Until we do, we will perpetuate the NEP without end, regardless of what we may say or intend.



 Selangor Times



Also by Lee Hwok Aun:

Voting by manifesto

I REALLY want to compare two election manifestos, but as I write only one exists.

The bounteous taking before generous giving

Sunnier days for workers?

Guarantee or speculation?

COME Dec 31, if Planet Earth continues orbiting the sun and twirling on its axis, 2012 will run its full term.

Dr Syed Husin – Justice For All

Don’t address him YB. If there is one who deserves to be honoured by us the rakyat, it’s him. But Dr Syed Husin Ali prefers not to be called Yang Berhormat, especially outside of the parliamentary chambers where he is Senator. You will not find a whiff of false modesty in his words. 

Education blueprint falls short

At last, some official confession of how bad things really are in our schools. 

Janji Dinanti

My secondary schoolmates gathered recently for a reunion. Many of us hadn’t met in 20 years, and in some cases couldn’t match names to faces.

Stop bullying tactics

Is Vision 2020 delusionary?

Looks like Vision 2020 is riding back into the limelight. With elections around the corner, as they have been for about a year, and destiny’s date now just eight years away, UMNO-BN fires a cocktail canister of pleas: so little time, so much to do, and only they will get us there, only they know how. It almost brings tears to my eyes, tears of…

Good conduct Bill for MPs?

Let’s say we table a Members of Parliament Proper Conduct Bill, and inserted sub-section 15(4) of the current Universities and University Colleges Act (UUCA) Amendment Bill. Why not? Both are institutions meant to pursue truth and generate debate.

Minimum wage still in infancy

It looks like we are rather conscious these days of lowly incomes and lofty inequalities.

What educational reform?

You might think, as we get closer to the promised reforms to the University and University Colleges Act (UUCA), that public authorities and education institutions would want to show some change of heart and mind. Think again.

Why settle for minimum wage?

THE lowest- paid workers in Selangor’s state agencies stand to gain from a wage boost next year. The state government’s recently announced RM1,500 minimum wage moves us in a fair and progressive direction.

Landing softly, hardly taking off

So the teaching of maths and science in English, and acronym of the year PPSMI, has been piloted to a soft landing. There’s a bit for all interested parties in the final give and take.

Malaysia should focus on education

2011 will have to go down as the year of the occupied square. The Occupy Wall Street month-long encampment at Zuccotti Park in Manhattan follows a motif painted from Tunis’ Kasbah Square to Cairo’s Tahrir Square, among the more epic places of revolutionary gathering.

Subversion and division

A subversive document lies before me. Brazenly, some Malaysians think “only those countries that undertook a systematic programme to transform the underlying structure of their economies … were able to rise from middle-income status to become high-income countries”. And these people say we should do likewise.

Whither BN’s logic?

When Nick Leeson, the infamous rogue trader, was convicted in 1995, his lines of defensce did not include “I lost money, how could I have committed fraud?” When professional cyclist Bernard Kohl was found guilty of doping in the Tour de France, he did not plead: “I didn’t win the race, how could I have cheated?”

Wither minimum wage bill?

In my last column I wrote about our rush to meet grandiose targets and end up with partial or delusional solutions. Right on cue, Datuk Seri Idris Jala disclosed on April 26 that Pemandu is expecting do deliver a modus operandi and quantum of minimum wage by the end of this year.

Country in a hurry

We are a country in a hurry: we want high-income status by 2020. We are also a KPI-driven nation: we speedily devise and monitor a litany of key performance indicators. And we are an ambitious lot: we set high targets and want fast results.

Malaysia’s "Me, too!" mentality

Murderously deforested Sarawak goes to their state polls soon. The world remains transfixed on the frenzy to cool down Japan’s Fukushima Daiichi power plants. And the Malaysian government refuses to impose a moratorium on its plans for nuclear energy.

The right answers or the right questions?

Did you hear a collective groan last week, emitting from the likes of Pantai Dalam, Serdang and Bangi? It's back to the semester grind for students at Universiti Malaya, Universiti Putra, Universiti Kebangsaan, and Malaysia's public universities and their now synchronised calendars.











From Windows to a Mac: A guide




In for a sweet treat




A Majestic presence





Copyright © 2018 Selangor Times. All rights reserved. Designed By Senedi